Re: Chevron calling for aptitude test (facilities engineer, graduate level)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
chosenmopol2 
Firstly, let me give kudos to those house members who are doing their best to kip us informed 4rm reliable sources on d latest and sharing dia various experiences on d subject matter. At this stage, I quite
believe its either Dragnet has run out of
questions or their R&D section
is really lagging behind. I mean
how do you explain the
justification behind a test
whose questions many - a-
candidate has become strongly
acquainted with, In any case,
the tests scores in any
psychometric test is supposed
to follow a Gaussian (normal)
distribution, with very few
people scoring high and very
few people scoring low. Once
the distribution becomes
largely skewed, then it doesn't
take rocket science to figure
out something is wrong. Those
who have access to Dragnet
can kindly pass the information
across.
Secondly, I would love to believe
everyone here is dignified
enough to restrain from
spreading spurious claims as
regarding the cut-off or
benchmark which might have eluded many.
Lastly,while some would
be shown the door at this
stage, others would be shown
the same door at the final
stage, according to Winston
Churchill, "success is never final,
failure is never fatal; courage is
what counts". Whatever
happens make the best out of
yourself, not every one is going
to be employed by Chevron! I rest my case.
Dude why did yo have to copy my post from the Mobil thread without proper reference. You, my friend, are one hell of a plagiarist!
Re: Chevron calling for aptitude test (facilities engineer, graduate level)
Lol.. No wonder I kinda knew i had seen dis post somewhere else.. So plagiarism stil dey 4 naijahotjob sef? Hahahaha
Re: Chevron calling for aptitude test (facilities engineer, graduate level)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
chosenmopol2 Firstly, let me give kudos to those house members who are doing their best to kip us informed 4rm reliable sources on d latest and sharing dia various experiences on d subject matter. At this stage, I quite
believe its either Dragnet has run out of
questions or their R&D section
is really lagging behind. I mean
how do you explain the
justification behind a test
whose questions many - a-
candidate has become strongly
acquainted with, In any case,
the tests scores in any
psychometric test is supposed
to follow a Gaussian (normal)
distribution, with very few
people scoring high and very
few people scoring low. Once
the distribution becomes
largely skewed, then it doesn't
take rocket science to figure
out something is wrong. Those
who have access to Dragnet
can kindly pass the information
across.
Secondly, I would love to believe
everyone here is dignified
enough to restrain from
spreading spurious claims as
regarding the cut-off or
benchmark which might have eluded many.
Lastly,while some would
be shown the door at this
stage, others would be shown
the same door at the final
stage, according to Winston
Churchill, "success is never final,
failure is never fatal; courage is
what counts". Whatever
happens make the best out of
yourself, not every one is going
to be employed by Chevron! I rest my case.
See dem See dem.. copy n post 'word for word' lwkmd....r u trying to prove to the house dat u too much... u must be a clown..
Re: Chevron calling for aptitude test (facilities engineer, graduate level)
@Chosenmopol: this allegation is so embarassing. Why should you plagirise?
Re: Chevron calling for aptitude test (facilities engineer, graduate level)
I think He's short of words so He just COPIED, LOLing continuesssssssssss
Re: Chevron calling for aptitude test (facilities engineer, graduate level)
@juddaxx,its quite worrisome,but all in all we pray for God's divine intervention as peace can only thrive where there exist justice,equity and fairplay.
Re: Chevron calling for aptitude test (facilities engineer, graduate level)
IF not because of corruption in the testing system, what stops them from sending test scores? Perhaps, because the selection process is not merit based thereby 'quenching noises' that may want to ensue.
Although this is not even dependent on dragnet coz clients (companies) are d ones that restrain dragnet from sending scores...not totally dragnet's fault 'sha'
Re: Chevron calling for aptitude test (facilities engineer, graduate level)
Any news of the next stage yet?
Re: Chevron calling for aptitude test (facilities engineer, graduate level)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Achiever888 IF not because of corruption in the testing system, what stops them from sending test scores? Perhaps, because the selection process is not merit based thereby 'quenching noises' that may want to ensue.
Although this is not even dependent on dragnet coz clients (companies) are d ones that restrain dragnet from sending scores...not totally dragnet's fault 'sha'
That may be true bro, cos i've heard people talking about receiving their scores from other dragnet tests for some coys (not oil coys o)
Re: Chevron calling for aptitude test (facilities engineer, graduate level)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
juddaxx Nobody can score 90% in dragnet test,reasons are: I discovered that the answers to the question from the guy that posted the expo where wrong,it took two brilliant heads to come up with both verbal and quantitative reasoning,secondly the answers are twisted in the two passages that I saw,people that wrote claimed that they encountered 2 new passages.so that means the other two threw them off balance. If Dragnet is really smart they should not consider anyone who score 90 and above becos it implies the person cheated and that is a way to easily catch a cheat... .
That may be too harsh, cos some smart guys (although few) can have such scores without using expo. If they go ahead with ur proposal these few may be affected but d challenge is how do they separate the sheep from the goats.
It is well o.
Re: Chevron calling for aptitude test (facilities engineer, graduate level)
Next Stage
Loading....... (God Knows Days/Months Remaining)
