Just ignore the mail, it's nothing but scam!
@akhagbeme, it cud take a week or 2 weeks. It depends. They are not predictable. But i'm quite sure it wont take up to 3 weeks frm experience. I'm expectin dragnet 2 release results and start calin 4 interview 4rm next week monday. Dats wat i've goten 2 hear 4rm an insider.
Just ignore the mail, it's nothing but scam!
Thanks Guys! I thought as much... Useless Scammers.
Most of u guys are wicked. U all have d dragnet leaked questions but none of u want to send it to us after our request.
Bcos of ur undue advantage, u are now suggesting 90% cut-off mark abi. Most of u all already know d answers before d exam.
Calculators were also not allowed too. Shame on all of u cheaters. U dont want to help odas abi and u want to get the job. Repercussion awaits u all
My brother. I don't know where you get your facts, neither do I know where those 'examiners' got their cut-off marks. But the fact still remains that the tests were simple, they are only testing your speed. For my self, I only had some time constraints in the Verbal Reasoning; but finished the rest two before time. Finished Abstract reasoning and still moved back to re-check, and I bet you, the questions were fresh to me. I have never seen them anywhere prior to the exam.
@geejay. It seems u ar still a newbie. If u dont know anything just stay mute.
Dose dat went for mobil and chevron exams saw d questions before d exams. I even saw a hard copy from a lady studying.
Ofcourse, Dragnet questions is easy. But u cant ever score 95% without malpractice. Dose cheaters wil b invited ahead of u and I.
For those of us that wrote the chevron petroleum/earth scientist test has anyone gotten any feedback from them?
Agreed with you guy. I have did dragnet test more than ten times and I have not been called for once after the test. even when i was expected to be called, i won't be called. At least I know that I am not so dull. I have wrote Drillog Petrodynamics Ltd (2009) conducted by the coy as paper based test (Numerical, Verbal, Electrical and Mechanical Test), Julius Berger Nigeria (2012) conducted by Adexen in Chams, Ikeja with negative marks as Computer based test(Numerical, Verbal, Engineering Test) but not dragnet question, Giesecke and Dievrient African Ltd (2012) conducted by the coy as paper based test (Electrical/IT test), KPMG (Paper test -2007). Among which I qualified for the interview stage.
Majorly, Let consider Julius Berger Nigeria Recruitment for Engineers administered by Adexen conducted in Chams, Lagos (2012). Adexen came with their questions (Numerical, Verbal, Engineering Test- you are to select your discipline question). Nobody know the question but people that have wrote the test in 2011 know the format but not the same question. It means this is what they call test. A lot of people came for the test as usual but few was called for the interview. Even I am not sure that I will be called because I am still comparing it to Dragnet GSE test.
Advice to Dragnet: Dragnet should set another test in similar format but different question from what we have been seeing before. I couldn't come for Dragnet Test (11.30am) in their office on 31st of July 2012 and Chevron Test (3.30pm) in Chams on 31st July 2012, just because I can't be taking a lot of excuses from my peanut paid company to write a test that will not be sincerely justified. we said some guys have the question and they called for Mobil Rescheduling of Test, I still try to come for the test still seeing almost the same question. why are you rescheduling the test? because I will tell you that someone like me if I saw a question to practice and I looked at it upto 5mins, if I see the same question 2yrs time I will still remember the answer. This is why I blame lecturers that set all his question from examples or note. Because you will cram what is inside the book.
All the test I am talking about, I know I can't score 90 except Drillog that is both OBJ and theory that I score 90. due to enough time and small questions (17 questions in 1hours, 14 Obj and 3 Theory and I miss 2 obj which is 5marks each) . Adexen test, I know i can't get more than 60. because I couldn't finish at all. But i pass the test.
In Dragnet Test, I usually covered up to (18 out of 20 Numerical and at worst I will score 17), (16 out of 16 Abstract and at worst I will score 13) then (12 out of 20 verbal and at worst I will scoretell me if Dragnet test is a real test where nobody have the test question under this limited time limit, nobody can score 80 percent. talkless of 99 or 95 dudes you are talking about.
I personally dont believe one needs 2 cheat to pass dragnet. Merely writing their tests several tyms makes u acquainted wiv their questions. The more rizn why they need more questions.
In the space of one month, majorly the same set of ppl wrote the first Mobil test, The re-take Mobil test, Chevron's Pet Eng'g test, Chevron's Facility eng'g test e.t.c. How won't ppl be smiling out of the hall like I observed on Tuesday?!
Goodluck 2 all. And I would suggest that ppl should free their mind from getting the said questions since the said bearers are not forthcoming. The tests are actually kinda cheap, so trust me when I say sound preparation and focus would enhance your performance.
Also for those that have had their fair share of 'unsuccesses' with dragnet, it would pay off soonest as you would become used 2 the questions with tym.
Lets say jobs dey 4 Naija, new sets of candidates would be writing d tests and not old cargoes as they would have been employed! God de
Firstly, let me give kudos to those house members who are doing their best to kip us informed 4rm reliable sources on d latest and sharing dia various experiences on d subject matter. At this stage, I quite
believe its either Dragnet has run out of
questions or their R&D section
is really lagging behind. I mean
how do you explain the
justification behind a test
whose questions many - a-
candidate has become strongly
acquainted with, In any case,
the tests scores in any
psychometric test is supposed
to follow a Gaussian (normal)
distribution, with very few
people scoring high and very
few people scoring low. Once
the distribution becomes
largely skewed, then it doesn't
take rocket science to figure
out something is wrong. Those
who have access to Dragnet
can kindly pass the information
across.
Secondly, I would love to believe
everyone here is dignified
enough to restrain from
spreading spurious claims as
regarding the cut-off or
benchmark which might have eluded many.
Lastly,while some would
be shown the door at this
stage, others would be shown
the same door at the final
stage, according to Winston
Churchill, "success is never final,
failure is never fatal; courage is
what counts". Whatever
happens make the best out of
yourself, not every one is going
to be employed by Chevron! I rest my case.